Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:02:10 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@FreeBSD.org>, Roman Kurakin <rik@inse.ru>, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r183881 - head/sys/netinet Message-ID: <86abd60xel.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20081015195521.J43361@delplex.bde.org> (Bruce Evans's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:10:21 %2B1000 (EST)") References: <200810141226.m9ECQtPW006469@svn.freebsd.org> <48F4A9A5.8020605@inse.ru> <200810141649.04834.max@love2party.net> <20081015195521.J43361@delplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> writes: > style(9) doesn't allow the C99 declaration since C99 hasn't noticed that > C99 exists. I vote for style(9)'s continued ignorance of C99 declarations. The only case in which I can see a net benefit is for one-off loop variables, and even there the benefit is probably not sufficient to justify the loss of compatibility with older compilers. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86abd60xel.fsf>