Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:27:54 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic in recent 6-current Message-ID: <20050208172754.GA25800@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050208164711.GC43179@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050208140419.GA15236@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20050208164711.GC43179@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:47:11AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:04:19PM +0100, Divacky Roman wrote: > > #22 0xc0493087 in softclock (dummy=0x0) at atomic.h:365 > > #23 0xc04768a3 in ithread_loop (arg=0xc1577480) > > at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546 > > #24 0xc0475be9 in fork_exit (callout=0xc0476761 <ithread_loop>, > > arg=0xc1577480, frame=0xd3fc3d48) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:790 > > #25 0xc057ef5c in fork_trampoline () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:208 > > > > > > (all other frames are either ??? or from ddb) > > Are you running a kernel built with -O2 (bad for gdb) or -O? -Os which is basically -O2, should I test with plain -O ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050208172754.GA25800>