Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 18:47:11 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <dyson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: jb@cimlogic.com.au (John Birrell) Cc: kpielorz@tdx.co.uk, tlambert@primenet.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VM changes broke SYSVSHM? Message-ID: <199805032347.SAA00601@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199805032100.HAA14880@cimlogic.com.au> from John Birrell at "May 4, 98 07:00:14 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Birrell said: > Karl Pielorz wrote: > > Very true, but it's still amazing the amount of people I see who say "I'm > > running 3.0 on our [production] server...", very scary ;-) > > This is NOT the case. I was referring to normal development work on > -current. People complain about not having better thread support. > People complain about developers not testing things before committing > them. Well if the committers themselves can't run -current, what do > they do? Commit anyway? Delay commits for a month? > FYI, the problems in -current are most definitely not the split code. I added it to 20Apr, with no problems. There is something odd going on, and I am doing a slow, ordered search for the problem. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805032347.SAA00601>