Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:33:03 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: frank@exit.com, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <200311251233.03642.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200311250153.hAP1rTOG019360@realtime.exit.com> References: <200311250153.hAP1rTOG019360@realtime.exit.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 12:23, Frank Mayhar wrote: > > Let's see. You dislike the dynamic root decision enough that > > you are considering the abandonment of FreeBSD. Then when > > you're told that you can still build a static root if you > > need/want it, you make a sarcastic remark. > > It wasn't sarcastic, it was serious. Needing to have special configuration > defeats the purpose of running FreeBSD for me. I'm busy enough that I > don't have time to deal with everything _now_; adding something else I have > to keep track of for a half-dozen systems is something else I just don't > need. You DO know FreeBSD is a cooperative project right? I hardly think you're in a position to complain about a (probably very minor) performance loss which has a trivial work around, which also benefits a fair number of users. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311251233.03642.doconnor>