Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:21:12 -0600 (MDT) From: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> To: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" <gollucci@wam.umd.edu>, CLE47@aol.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ip question Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006262219430.20919-100000@inconnu.isu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20000627025025.I57917@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I stand corrected, I just found out about the nslookup deprecation last week and started to get familiar with it Saturday... On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Ben Smithurst wrote: > John Galt wrote: > > > Use dig--they're talking about deprecating nslookup in bind 9... so it'll > > be: > > > > dig @63.8.31.60 > > No, it won't. @foo specifies that dig should use foo as the nameserver. I > think you'd need > > dig -x 63.8.31.60 ptr > > The only thing which annoys me about dig is that you don't do "dig > foo" where "foo" is a local name, you must explicitly say "dig > foo.my.domain.whatever.com". Oh well. > > -- Customer: "I'm running Windows '98" Tech: "Yes." Customer: "My computer isn't working now." Tech: "Yes, you said that." Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0006262219430.20919-100000>