Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 05:51:11 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Peter Holm <peter@holm.cc> Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Subject: Re: Giantless VFS. Message-ID: <20041201054925.N18185@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <20041130075602.GA72926@peter.osted.lan> References: <20041120000743.G18094@mail.chesapeake.net> <41A1C3BD.4010903@fer.hr><20041123013054.GA38804@peter.osted.lan> <20041130075602.GA72926@peter.osted.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Peter Holm wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:39:01AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Peter Holm wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 06:46:50AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Ivan Voras wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The short description: > > > > > > This patch removes Giant from the read(), write(), and fstat() syscalls, > > > > > > as well as page faults, and bufdone (io interrupts) when using FFS. It > > > > > > > > > > What is the plan re: RELENG_5? Will things like this (giantless vm, fs) > > > > > be merged into it? > > > > > > > > The giantless vm was already merged back to RELENG_5 and enabled on amd64, > > > > and i386. I hope to merge the giantless vfs back after a month or so of > > > > no problems on -current. I hope to commit it to -current this week. > > > > > > > > I haven't received any feedback from the list though. I hope people are > > > > testing it. Perhaps the silence indicates universal success? :-) > > > > > > > > > > Here's a problem I ran into during stress test: > > > > > > http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/jeff01.html > > > > > > Let me know if you need more gdb output. > > > > Thanks, this is the most serious bug of the couple that were reported. It > > indicates a possible race to flush a buffer. I'm still looking for this. > > What steps did you take to produce this panic? > > > > I ran my kernel stress test: http://www.holm.cc/stress/src/stress.tgz > I stopped using your patch after the two reported problems. > Let me know if you would like me to perform more testing with your patch. Thanks, I think I may have fixed the problems that were exposed via your stress tool. I'll post an updated patch to the list in a moment. I was wondering if you have seen a panic in pmap_invalidate_range via sigexit()? It seems to have been caused by illegal calls to sigexit() from trapsignal(). If you have not reported it yet, I have a copy of a stack here and I can let the responsible people know. Cheers, Jeff > > - Peter > > > > > > > - Peter > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > -- > Peter Holm > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041201054925.N18185>