Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:58:25 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang Makefile ports/lang/ifc8 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/lang/ifc8/files assert_fail.c cxa_atexit.c cxa_finalize.c errno_location.c exclude exclude_noportdocs ld.c linux_file.c linux_stat.c mcount.S ... Message-ID: <20040119165825.4aa630a8@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040119150116.GC28508@FreeBSD.org> References: <200401191452.i0JEqDsi040194@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040119150116.GC28508@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 07:01:16 -0800
Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > Log:
> > Add new port lang/ifc8
>
> It is common to include a description of what the port is when
> adding a new port - saves everybody that reads cvs-ports et al
> from looking in the pkg-descr to find out what the port is (and
> can help when browsing cvs logs, too.)
It's v8 of Intels Fortran Compiler (ifc). v7 is already in the tree. He
follows my leading with icc, but I requested a repo copy of icc to icc7
whereas he just added the ifc8 port.
I suggest to remove the port and let cvs@ do a repo copy of ifc to ifc7.
The commit message should also have a note about using copies of large
parts of the icc port. I haven't looked at the files yet, but just from
looking at the commit log there may be something wrong with it,
cxa_finalize.c isn't needed anymore as the entire DSO support is in
cxa_atexit.c now (it has the same line count as the icc one).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I will be available to get hired in April 2004.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040119165825.4aa630a8>