Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:19:33 -0500 From: Bruce Burden <brucegb@realtime.net> To: Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Users <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable? Message-ID: <20050609011933.GH20906@tigerfish2.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <A61058B8-EEA8-41EF-B7DC-DD94D1CC5198@mac.com> References: <20050608001306.3FB1F43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42A6C7CE.9000002@incubus.de> <200506080908.02478.fcash@ocis.net> <42A71AE1.8020300@incubus.de> <6.2.1.2.0.20050608134054.06b8ccb0@64.7.153.2> <42A73293.5000105@incubus.de> <A61058B8-EEA8-41EF-B7DC-DD94D1CC5198@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:04:20PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
>
> However, it's common to find half-decent hardware RAID functionality
> on many x86 and AMD64 motherboards, and PCI-based RAID cards are not
> very expensive.
>
Of course, asr() isn't 64 bit safe, so that can throw a
wrinkle into the AMD64 story... :-/
And, yeah, I have considered volunteering for this.
Bruce
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I like bad!" Bruce Burden Austin, TX.
- Thuganlitha
The Power and the Prophet
Robert Don Hughes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050609011933.GH20906>