Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 01:43:03 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: scanner@jurai.net, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: OSSH and NetBSD's "OSSH" ? Message-ID: <200010050043.e950h3n29195@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> of "Wed, 04 Oct 2000 12:35:23 PDT." <20001004123523.G73561@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:44:27PM -0400, scanner@jurai.net wrote:
> >
> > Since were trying to keep in sync with OpenSSH as the goal, has anyone
> > given thought if we will maintain compatability with NetBSD's
> > "OpenSSH" replacement?
> >
> > I think their decision to do their own implementation is just daft. But I
> > am curious as to how this will affect things. I am guessing we will just
> > sync with OSSH and if NetBSD's version happens to be compat fine if not
> > too bad so sad. This whole thing really annoys me. But I am curious about
> > others thoughts.
>
> I didn't know they have decided to fork their own version - all I've
> seen in their cvs logs is integration of the openbsd version. At any
> rate, I will be continuing to track the openbsd version, and
> compatability is something which the open and netbsd guys will have to
> work out for themselves.
They've imported OpenSSH while they develop their own ``cleancode''
implmentation (I think that was the terminology they used).
> Kris
>
> --
> In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
> -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010050043.e950h3n29195>