Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:37:31 +0100 From: Anders Nordby <anders@FreeBSD.org> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: FreeBSD Ports List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems (linux emulation?) building Openoffice 1.1 Message-ID: <20040211063731.GA81793@totem.fix.no> In-Reply-To: <20040210215513.Y35085@blues.jpj.net> References: <20040210180238.GA16205@teddy.fas.com> <40291E81.6010803@math.missouri.edu> <20040210132410.F90776@blues.jpj.net> <20040210222951.GB27223@teddy.fas.com> <20040210215513.Y35085@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:07:05PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: >> BTW, do you [know] where teh default "jail" for linux_base is? > Those messages have been causing a lot of questions. :( Would there be an > objection if I just removed them? Anders? Please try to install linux_base in a jail before you touch it. I see there seems to be something wrong about the patch I added, the message these users are seing should not be shown unless they have WITH_JAIL defined. I'll look into it and get it fixed. Cheers, -- Anders.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040211063731.GA81793>