Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:25:19 -0400 From: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> To: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> Cc: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Poudriere failing on some 10-STABLE ports --- "uses VFP register arguments" Message-ID: <5D3A3A05-27B2-4680-9711-D02696D4ABE5@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <20160703044730.GG3406@www.zefox.net> References: <FD6DC5B4-46CD-4494-853B-955C790946EA@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <CAJwjRmRZDVMHTV7-gKpu9Kq25wHMt1CQYuLKcZY5QgX8ZARULg@mail.gmail.com> <854D8FF8-CE45-44C1-B371-79AA6DD782FB@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1466799055.72182.50.camel@freebsd.org> <B84DD3F6-FBA3-48AD-BAE8-47B41B91944F@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <20160703044730.GG3406@www.zefox.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Jul 3, 2016, at 12:47 AM, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
>>
>> I think this package building issue is probably a gentle hint that I should also upgrade my 10-STABLE armv6 systems (Raspberry Pi) to 11-CURRENT, like my BeagleBone Black. It's probably better in the long run than trying to figure out how to build 10-STABLE packages, as 11-CURRENT appears to be where all the focus and TLC is in the FreeBSD/arm world nowadays. Plus, I'd only have to maintain one local FreeBSD/arm package repository... :-)
>>
>
> Moving to 11-CURRENT might not help much. An RPI2 at r302244 with ports at 417951 stops in
> portmaster -af
> with:
>
> .....
> Build a threading Perl? [y]
> Use which C compiler? [cc]
> Checking for GNU cc in disguise and/or its version number...
> Now, how can we feed standard input to your C preprocessor...
> Directories to use for library searches?
> [/usr/lib /usr/local/lib /usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.8.0/lib /usr/lib]
> What is the file extension used for shared libraries? [so]
> Make shared library basenames unique? [n]
> Build Perl for SOCKS? [n]
> Try to use long doubles if available? [n]
> Checking for optional libraries...
> What libraries to use? [-lpthread -lgdbm -lm -lcrypt -lutil]
> What optimizer/debugger flag should be used? [-g]
> Any additional cc flags?
> [-DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -DDEBUGGING -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-protector -I/usr/local/include]
> Let me guess what the preprocessor flags are...
> Any additional ld flags (NOT including libraries)?
> [-lpthread -Wl,-E -fstack-protector -L/usr/local/lib]
> Checking your choice of C compiler and flags for coherency...
> I've tried to compile and run the following simple program:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main() { printf("Ok\n"); return(0); }
>
> I used the command:
>
> cc -o try -g -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -DDEBUGGING -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-protector -I/usr/local/include -lpthread -Wl,-E -fstack-protector -L/usr/local/lib try.c -lpthread -lgdbm -lm -lcrypt -lutil
> ./try
>
> and I got the following output:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: ERROR: try uses VFP register arguments, /usr/local/lib/libgdbm.so does not
> /usr/bin/ld: failed to merge target specific data of file /usr/local/lib/libgdbm.so
> cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> I can't compile the test program.
> You have a BIG problem. Shall I abort Configure [y]
> Ok. Stopping Configure.
> ===> Script "Configure" failed unexpectedly.
>
> It appears that a mismatch has developed between the base system and the ports which
> hasn't been resolved by building world. I'll try again but am not optimistic.
>
> Thanks for reading, any advice appreciated!
>
> bob prohaska
I'm not having any problems building FreeBSD/arm 11-CURRENT ports under FreeBSD/amd64 11-CURRENT via Poudriere.
My last successful build of lang/perl5.20 was on 2016-06-30:
====>> Building lang/perl5.20
build started at Thu Jun 30 16:40:27 EDT 2016
port directory: /usr/ports/lang/perl5.20
building for: FreeBSD armv6_current-default-job-02 11.0-ALPHA5 FreeBSD 11.0-ALPHA5 r302298 arm
maintained by: perl@FreeBSD.org
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: head/lang/perl5.20/Makefile 414862 2016-05-09 16:03:40Z mat $
Poudriere version: 3.1.14
Host OSVERSION: 1100120
Jail OSVERSION: 1100120
The revision of the FreeBSD/arm 11-CURRENT jail is later than yours above: r302298 vs. r302244. I don't know whether that is significant.
I've not tried to build ports natively under FreeBSD/arm because it's much easier for me to build them on a build machine using Poudriere along with the other architectures for which I build local repositories.
Cheers,
Paul.
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5D3A3A05-27B2-4680-9711-D02696D4ABE5>