Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:39:48 -0800 From: "Peter Wemm" <peter@wemm.org> To: "Mark Andrews" <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> Cc: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru, Andy Dills <andy@xecu.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0? Message-ID: <e7db6d980803051339o4ec4184g15541ddaaa896a1e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200803051432.m25EWaeT035807@drugs.dv.isc.org> References: <20080305082031.E37745@shell.xecu.net> <200803051432.m25EWaeT035807@drugs.dv.isc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> wrote: > There is a reasonable chance that this mail will leave here > over IPv6 for some of the recipients. It will almost > certainly travel over IPv6 for at least one hop. > > Mark It did: drugs.dv.isc.org -> IPv6 -> mx1.freebsd.org -> IPv6 -> hub.freebsd.org -> Mailman -> localhost -> hub.freebsd.org -> IPv6 -> mx2.freebsd.org -> IPv6 -> me The only IPv4 hop in this path was when Mailman connected to localhost (127.0.0.1) to reinject the email. And that is because I had 127.0.0.1 hard coded in a config file. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert Sewell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e7db6d980803051339o4ec4184g15541ddaaa896a1e>