Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 04:10:18 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, smp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Where to initialize certain locks... Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020402040809.18134L-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <3CA974A8.5440F3C9@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: :If you are going to complain about SYSINIT(), at least complain :about something like the bubble sort in init_main.c (so I can :dismiss it as a one-time operation that didn't need to be that :fast, compared to, say, not doing concurrent hardware probes :simultaneously for lack of a one-shot timer outcall mechanism). Dood, you're going way off track here. I was soley disliking the fact that I had my MTX_SYSINIT() macro have the sub and order arguments. I am not and was not complaining about SYSINIT(). -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020402040809.18134L-100000>