Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 15:44:50 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: install touching mbr Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004031541350.11914@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20100403205856.GA20454@icarus.home.lan> References: <20100403174812.59c40c99.matheus@eternamente.info> <20100403205856.GA20454@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to >> leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that >> was on control. this options is not what I think it should, or there >> is really a issue here ? > > I can confirm this behaviour. Someone may have broken something when > tinkering around in that part of sysinstall (since the Standard vs. > BootMgr options were moved around compared to previous releases). Not sure how to repeat the bug, but it's been there at least a few months: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0909262030060.13303 http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58c737d70909262054k7c7b1402w4f9c902fdca2640c -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1004031541350.11914>