Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:38:29 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: attilio@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: LK_SHARED/LK_DOWNGRADE adjustments to lock.9 manual page Message-ID: <50A552C5.5060703@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndAfUPOWzvpXtn7tHfzV00a%2B1PkfcXmEYo1eNg3RZG4Bew@mail.gmail.com> References: <50A4E8C0.5030608@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-FndAfUPOWzvpXtn7tHfzV00a%2B1PkfcXmEYo1eNg3RZG4Bew@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 15/11/2012 20:46 Attilio Rao said the following: > On 11/15/12, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> To people knowing the code, >> >> do the following documentation changes look correct? > > The latter chunk is not correct. > It will panic only if assertions are on. But the current content is not correct too? > I was thinking that however > it would be good idea to patch lockmgr to panic also in non-debugging > kernel situation. It would make sense indeed, IMO. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50A552C5.5060703>