Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:00:47 GMT From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/72979: unkillable process(es) stuck in `STOP' state Message-ID: <200410271200.i9RC0ln9041051@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/72979; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu> Cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>, re@freebsd.org, davidxu@t2t2.com, davidxu@viatech.com.cn, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/72979: unkillable process(es) stuck in `STOP' state Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:58:44 -0400 On Tuesday 26 October 2004 10:53 pm, Ken Smith wrote: = % gdb prog # can be anything = gdb> break main = gdb> run = gdb> ^Z = % ps = % kill <pid of gdb> = = Process for prog will be left behind and can't be killed. With David's = patch process for prog dies along with gdb. Should not just the gdb be killed in the above scenario -- without the explicit killing of prog? Or does killing the tracer always imply killing the tracee? Thanks! -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410271200.i9RC0ln9041051>