Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:40:17 -0500
From:      Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Cc:        Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com>, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, mini@haikugeek.com, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/loader version src/share/examp
Message-ID:  <20011211114017.S1956@espresso.q9media.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011211005211.V92148@elvis.mu.org>; from bright@mu.org on Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:52:11AM -0600
References:  <20011210201909.O92148@elvis.mu.org> <Pine.BSF.4.30.0112102122001.22013-100000@niwun.pair.com> <20011210221836.N1956@espresso.q9media.com> <616630000.1008044969@lobster.originative.co.uk> <20011211010336.Q1956@espresso.q9media.com> <20011211005211.V92148@elvis.mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> writes:
> * Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> [011211 00:05] wrote:
> > Perhaps a secure loader would be useful, such that it doesn't allow
> > interrupting.  Similar things could be done with the pre-loader boot,
> > but this write from loader feature seems so useful to me that I can't
> > imagine why we would want to turn it off by default, particularly
> > given the intrinsic insecurities of our current loader.
> 
> Honestly I feel that the requirement to learn Forth as a prerequisite
> to hacking a FreeBSD box this way makes it highly unlikely that one
> would do so. :)

I don't follow.  Obviously the kiosk/secure version would be a
compile-time tuneable, probably controlled by /etc/make.conf.

Best regards,
Mike Barcroft

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011211114017.S1956>