Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 10:55:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <200110271455.f9REtFw86156@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200110270623.f9R6NLk43302@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200110270133.f9R1Xnv06295@mass.dis.org> <200110270349.f9R3nf678020@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <200110270623.f9R6NLk43302@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 23:23:21 -0700 (PDT), Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> said: > This is the defect list for C99. It directly contradicts the reasoning > in C90 defect report #67. C99 is not the same language as C90. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110271455.f9REtFw86156>