Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:24:23 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Minnesota Slinky <mnslinky@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO going after BSD??? Message-ID: <20031120072423.GA80697@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <000c01c3af1e$b42e9fe0$6801a8c0@Nomad> References: <20031120013831.GT98272@klapaucius.zer0.org> <000c01c3af1e$b42e9fe0$6801a8c0@Nomad>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:28:04PM -0600, Minnesota Slinky wrote: > I talked to a couple of people who do beta testing for Microsoft and > they said the issue came up a few years ago. According to them (one > being my father), it has to do with security and virus protection. > Again, this is second-hand, so take it for what it's worth... There's no possible sense in which this can be true. Plain text attachments do not create a security or virus risk. Kris --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/vGwnWry0BWjoQKURAsVuAJ9GgqpbLGMdrWXcukB3Cd4L8D8R/QCcDcDh R3dazMObaw/QN4AwIY7ABTY= =Q1e3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031120072423.GA80697>