Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 21:41:34 +0300 From: abi <abi@abinet.ru> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what to do when base openssl isn't suitable Message-ID: <57780ADE.6020503@abinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <201607021610.u62GAkUS096413@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <201607021610.u62GAkUS096413@gw.catspoiler.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I tried to build www/nginx today, however it seems ignoring DEFAULT_VERSIONS knob. Old style knobs works. On 02.07.2016 19:10, Don Lewis wrote: > On 2 Jul, Gerard Seibert wrote: >> I have to admit that this whole discussion has gotten me confused. I >> use "openssl" from ports, always have and probably always will. I use >> to use the now apparently depreciate statement in the /etc/make.conf >> file: >> >> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=YES > That's what I've been doing to build my own package set. > >> From what I am reading, I would replace that line with the following >> statement: >> >> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl > I believe that is correct. > >> to force the use of the "ports" version of "openssl". Is that correct, >> or is my interpretation of this incorrect? >> >> Thanks >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57780ADE.6020503>