Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Jan 2001 09:24:13 +0600 (ALMT)
From:      Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz>
To:        Rogier Mulhuijzen <rmulhuijzen@Transfer-Solutions.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: NTFS issue (was: Panic w/crash dump (looks like atomic.h  problem))
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101200910200.37745-100000@lion.butya.kz>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101200846060.37745-100000@lion.butya.kz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Boris Popov wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Rogier Mulhuijzen wrote:
> 
> > During normal operation on my NTFS partition I got no messages, so I took a 
> > bold step and added 'ip->i_devvp = ntmp->ntm_devvp;' just before the VREF call.
> 
> 	You're absolutely right here. This line definitely should be
> presented in the code.

	Hmm, scratch this. This field initialized when ntnode is born and
it should be valid while ntnode is alive (I've looked at the wrong place
first time).

	This probably caused by vnode or ntnode being recycled due to a
locking problem or missing reference.

--
Boris Popov
http://www.butya.kz/~bp/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0101200910200.37745-100000>