Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:58:39 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org>
Cc:        David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.lib.mk
Message-ID:  <20030904185839.GB4481@sunbay.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030904174100.GY695@roark.gnf.org>
References:  <200309040429.h844TBhD058678@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030904083617.GA56261@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030904092755.GD45051@sunbay.com> <20030904140129.GA61909@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030904155659.GC97732@sunbay.com> <20030904162656.GA396@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030904174100.GY695@roark.gnf.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="NMuMz9nt05w80d4+"
Content-Disposition: inline


--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:41:00AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:26:56AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:56:59PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > Sure.  The fix is to make ``cc --print-search-dirs'' output include
> > > the /lib directory too. =20
> >=20
> > That is trival.
> >=20
> > > I'm currently testing some patches with bsd.lib.mk,v 1.152.
> >=20
> > We should all agree on where the symlink for things like libc.so.X live.
> > I'm 99% sure Peter will argue /usr/lib, and I personally don't care -- I
> > just want one of them.  Before commiting yet something else to
> > bsd.lib.mk, what direction are you going in?
>=20
> It is much more appealing to me to put everything that is needed for a bu=
ild
> into /usr/lib. /lib should only have enough to get us up and running, not
> enough to get us compiling, that's what /usr/lib is for. I have a patch
> that will do what we want, I'll see if I can dig it up.
>=20
The patch is not a problem (attached).  I've been looking at
how our friends do this.  NetBSD has symlinks in /usr/lib to
/lib, both to .so and .so.X, and their cc(1) and ld(1) don't
look things in /lib.  Linux looks things up in both /lib and
/usr/lib, and does not have symlinks from /usr/lib to /lib.

We can implement either (I already have all the necessary
patches), so the question is which one do we really want.

The only reason while I still think we should support both
/lib and /usr/lib in cc(1) and ld(1) by default is to allow
our users to have /usr symlinked somethere, otherwise relative
symlinking from /usr/lib to ../../lib does not work, and we
are back to that endless thread.  BTW, NetBSD uses absolute
paths in symlinks from /usr/lib to /lib:

> ls -l /usr/lib/libz.so*
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel     16 Aug 30 14:58 /usr/lib/libz.so -> /lib/libz=
=2Eso.0.3
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel     16 Aug 30 14:58 /usr/lib/libz.so.0 -> /lib/li=
bz.so.0.3
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel     16 Aug 30 14:58 /usr/lib/libz.so.0.3 -> /lib/=
libz.so.0.3


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software Ltd,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer

--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=p

Index: bsd.lib.mk
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.153
diff -u -r1.153 bsd.lib.mk
--- bsd.lib.mk	4 Sep 2003 04:29:11 -0000	1.153
+++ bsd.lib.mk	4 Sep 2003 18:45:27 -0000
@@ -208,8 +208,9 @@
 	    ${_INSTALLFLAGS} ${_SHLINSTALLFLAGS} \
 	    ${SHLIB_NAME} ${DESTDIR}${SHLIBDIR}
 .if defined(SHLIB_LINK)
-	ln -fs ${SHLIB_NAME} ${DESTDIR}${SHLIBDIR}/${SHLIB_LINK}
-.if (${LIBDIR} != ${SHLIBDIR})
+.if ${SHLIBDIR} == ${LIBDIR}
+	ln -fs ${SHLIB_NAME} ${DESTDIR}${LIBDIR}/${SHLIB_LINK}
+.else
 	ln -fs ${LIBDIR:C|/[^/]+|/..|g:S|^/||}${SHLIBDIR}/${SHLIB_NAME} \
 	    ${DESTDIR}${LIBDIR}/${SHLIB_LINK}
 .endif

--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+--

--lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/V4tfUkv4P6juNwoRAmglAJ9ZB0nvcrUR2/u1ityFdKf71bh0WACZATkb
zhMpQdicFDYMH2i0YuEyQ2Y=
=kcbR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030904185839.GB4481>