Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:08:22 -0500
From:      Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu>
To:        Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "arm@freebsd.org" <arm@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: RPI-B VM panic
Message-ID:  <539F1676.2020406@rice.edu>
In-Reply-To: <539E9DD4.4080001@selasky.org>
References:  <539170AA.2000109@selasky.org> <5396947A.1060601@selasky.org>	 <5396A0D1.80309@selasky.org> <5396AF63.6040209@selasky.org>	 <8BA66A45-E08A-475D-A1FA-5047E862681E@rice.edu>	 <5398B6EA.9030408@selasky.org>	 <A9433B36-C15C-455E-AB80-3999596936F9@rice.edu>	 <5398BFD9.60502@selasky.org>	 <7390A211-C949-4079-B3DA-BF23798B8992@rice.edu>	 <539942C0.5010706@selasky.org> <5399DF7F.4010501@rice.edu>	 <5399E349.5050600@selasky.org> <1402594327.20883.216.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <5399E660.5050207@selasky.org> <5399E901.1080805@selasky.org> <5399FB57.8090102@rice.edu> <539A140F.6020107@selasky.org> <539B2BE8.2090005@rice.edu> <539E9DD4.4080001@selasky.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/16/2014 02:33, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>
>> This output shows that according to the object's list of pages there is
>> already a page allocated at pindex 4 (or "off=0x4" above).  If this list
>> is correct, and not itself corrupted, then we shouldn't be making a call
>> to vm_page_alloc() to allocate another page at the same pindex.
>>
>> Whether it is this list of pages that is corrupted or not, this means
>> that the object's list of pages (shown above) and its radix tree of
>> pages are out of sync.
>>
>> I'm curious to know what mpred is when the assertion fails.  That will
>> tell us something about the state of the radix tree.
>>
>> I've also modified ddb's "show object" to provide an additional bit of
>> information.  However, it would be really nice if "show object"
>> displayed the state of the radix tree.
>>
>>
>
> This patch makes no change.

Can you please clarify?  Did I not attach the new patch?  The new patch
changed the output of the KASSERT and ddb's "show object" so that we
could get a better idea where the vm object corruption lies. 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?539F1676.2020406>