Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:41:56 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kowalik <kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance issues in 5.3-RELEASE. Message-ID: <20041118094156.GA12415@uci.agh.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <opshnjzetf8527sy@smtp.local> References: <20041117094022.GA8682@uci.agh.edu.pl> <opshnjzetf8527sy@smtp.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ronald Klop [ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org] wrote:
>
> For what I have seen everybody uses snd_emu10k1. Since I use my onboard
> soundcard (snd_ess* (not MPSAFE)) I have less problems with my sound under
> disk load.
> [...]
No, I don't. I use and_emu10kx, which behaves far better under high load
than the standard snd_emu10k1.
> Oh, I saw a post a while ago on stable@ or on current@ about a buffer in
> emu10k1. If it was increased it had less problems. [...]
Yes, I've read those mails, though it's not sound-under-load issue. Not
only and not mainly. It's more that the interactive work in X(org) under
the high i/o in certain cases (like the mentioned untaring) is getting
painful.
Regards,
--
There is no satisfaction in hanging a man who does not object to it.
-- G.B. Shaw
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041118094156.GA12415>