Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:54:48 +0200 From: Oliver Brandmueller <ob@e-Gitt.NET> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS will gone,FreeBSD will import btrfs? Message-ID: <20100818125447.GR44426@e-Gitt.NET> In-Reply-To: <4C6ABD04.3030506@delphij.net> References: <AANLkTinL6NmuopDaQ9nhWhsCgz3=uEo00%2BYYa_jOOM7N@mail.gmail.com> <4C6ABD04.3030506@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:47:00AM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > It's not "gone" since Oracle can not withdraw code that is already > licensed under CDDL. They _may_ choose not to release anything new but > we already have a newer zfs version that have basic functionality usable > in p4. So all we need to direct some of the money we already spend for=20 supporting developers and certain developments to core ZFS developers no=20 longer employed by Sun/Oracle and that way make FreeBSD the primary ZFS=20 development platform for the future. If you have the key developers, the=20 community will follow. Before someone starts argueing... I know, it's not that easy and I don't=20 have a clue how one would do that. This is most probably more like a=20 crazy idea than a plan that could actually work :-/ - Oliver --=20 | Oliver Brandmueller http://sysadm.in/ ob@sysadm.in | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | --jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkxr2BcACgkQiqtMdzjafym/lACeNMTw8K1dm+YgAS0tcMv0U7Jq +nMAoMH+6FaqD8rVOi/mkJorVnjA5WKT =fMMP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100818125447.GR44426>