Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:19:19 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Urankar Mikael <mikael.urankar@ujf-grenoble.fr> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD Message-ID: <AANLkTikhs3NpfPPDSR%2BoxPyjjOLTCON7aueRkU86=aUs@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110309091246.GC3530@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr> References: <AANLkTim_mTTLPA6KbT2b7pxm1ZmrS7cq5ew99P3zAFZa@mail.gmail.com> <20110305084520.GB2833@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr> <AANLkTik6fhKqRgP=kfyCxkZkG2ZD92BJYEobuvwvzvk%2B@mail.gmail.com> <20110305163034.GD2833@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr> <AANLkTinUwXv47e5YX=hYbJvVCjsUA1E-nnUQeTpvPGoH@mail.gmail.com> <20110309073523.GA3530@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr> <AANLkTi==JZ2uwdTH=AK%2Bd42haUcp4zkxV-Toe6TM8hkX@mail.gmail.com> <20110309091246.GC3530@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Woo. That's great news. On a non-11n card too. Excellent! adrian On 9 March 2011 17:12, Urankar Mikael <mikael.urankar@ujf-grenoble.fr>wrote: > Yes ! > > On Wed 09 March 2011 at 04:58:50PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > So you're saying -head is better, right? > > > > On 9 March 2011 15:35, Urankar Mikael <mikael.urankar@ujf-grenoble.fr > >wrote: > > > > > Here are some dumb benchmarks through ftp : > > > > > > with 8.2R RX rate is 2400kBps and TX rate is 810KBps > > > on a 9-CURRENT RX rate is 2700kBps and TX rate is 2700kBps > > > > > > More info on my system : > > > ath0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x5b001385 chip=0x0013168c > > > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > > vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.' > > > device = '802.11a/b/g Wireless Adapter (AR2312)' > > > > > > ath0: <Atheros 5212> mem 0x88000000-0x8800ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on > > > cardbus0 > > > ath0: AR2413 mac 7.9 RF2413 phy 4.5 > > > > > > FreeBSD iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #39 > > > r219368M: Mon Mar 7 12:15:50 CET 2011 > > > > > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/ah_osdep.c 219315 2011-03-05 21:20:18Z > adrian $ > > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c 219185 2011-03-02 17:19:54Z adrian > $ > > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_debug.c 218058 2011-01-29 05:08:21Z > > > adrian $ > > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_keycache.c 219185 2011-03-02 > 17:19:54Z > > > adrian $ > > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_pci.c 192147 2009-05-15 17:02:11Z imp > $ > > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_sysctl.c 219180 2011-03-02 16:03:19Z > > > adrian $ > > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c 218932 2011-02-22 00:37:53Z > adrian $ > > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_tx_ht.c 219214 2011-03-03 03:02:06Z > > > adrian $ > > > > > > > > > On Sun 06 March 2011 at 05:02:38AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > What was the previous performance? And which chipsets? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adrian > > > > > > > > On 6 March 2011 00:30, Urankar Mikael < > mikael.urankar@ujf-grenoble.fr > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sat 05 March 2011 at 03:27:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > > Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything! > > > > > > > > > > > > Adrian > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael < > > > mikael.urankar@ujf-grenoble.fr > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd > > > really > > > > > > > > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and > found/fixed > > > a > > > > > few > > > > > > > bugs > > > > > > > > in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced > > > > > regressions. > > > > > > > I'd > > > > > > > > like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg) > support in > > > > > > > > weird/wonderful ways. I'd also like to make sure that I > haven't > > > > > > > > broken/changed the behaviour or performance of the NICs in > any > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please give things a good thrashing and let me know the > results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm still working towards debugging and enabling basic 11n > > > support, > > > > > but I > > > > > > > > need to first make sure that I haven't broken legacy > operation in > > > any > > > > > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you interested by tests on an old atheros card (Atheros > 5212, > > > > > AR2413 > > > > > > > mac 7.9 RF2413 phy 4.5) ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everything seems to work fine, performances are as good as before. > > > > > I'm only doing basic stuff with this card (mostly web surfing), I'm > > > > > connected to an AP with WPA encryption. If you want me to test > other > > > > > encryption or setup an AP with this card or whatever, feel free to > ask. > > > > > > > > > > And thanks for you work ! >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikhs3NpfPPDSR%2BoxPyjjOLTCON7aueRkU86=aUs>