Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Dec 2025 21:29:07 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 230779] Broadcom 9480 (using SAS3516) requires newer mrsas and not mpr in kernel
Message-ID:  <bug-230779-227-WQQVp0mUYw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-230779-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230779

--- Comment #7 from adamz@olympustechgroup.com ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #6)

Not to derail this bug report but to answer your question:
I know I didn't file a bug as I was too busy dealing with massive recovery
efforts and I haven't had success filing reports historically.  The issue was
similar to
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/fsck-on-big-filesystems-100tb.77305/ and I
had reached out to mckusick@FreeBSD.org via email with no response.  It looks
like there were still 32bit references in the UFS2 code that effectively
results in running out of inodes even though df says otherwise.

My specific error on two independant filesystems that both crashed at similar
times (one was an rsync backup of the other) is below:
fsck_ufs: inoinfo: inumber 18446744071562078208 out of range

The end result was we lost all of our data due to corruption, even though
recovery tools could see files, nothing was recoverable.  There was no hardware
failure and the exact same hardware was ultimately reused again once we moved
on to other OS and filesystems.  That reason alone resulted in us dropping
FreeBSD from every system we use and moving off of UFS.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230779-227-WQQVp0mUYw>