Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:29:12 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/pgadmin3-12 Makefile ports/databases/pgadmin3-12/files patch-src-include-pgFunction.h patch-src-include-pgObject.h Message-ID: <20061219222912.GA90223@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <4586E79D.8000509@FreeBSD.org> References: <200612181019.kBIAJGmG097413@repoman.freebsd.org> <4586E79D.8000509@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:10:21AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Max Khon wrote: > > fjoe 2006-12-18 10:19:16 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > databases/pgadmin3-12 Makefile > > Added files: > > databases/pgadmin3-12/files patch-src-include-pgFunction.h > > patch-src-include-pgObject.h > > Log: > > - Fix build with gcc 4.1. > > - Bump PORTREVISION. > > I'm curious, why bump PORTREVISION in this situation? New patches. It forces a rebuild of the packages on the packagebuilding cluster, so that you know they all build again. It also gives better information is you get kris-mail, because you know what patches were applied (based on the port revision nunmber). And it will thousands of machines on the internet go "Oh boy lucky me! I get a chance to recompile pgadmin3-12 again!" Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061219222912.GA90223>