Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:24:52 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD Message-ID: <fhv8ps$2iq$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <b41c75520711201001j6746f7b7r85d14dddd5a9eec8@mail.gmail.com> References: <47431B75.4040601@chistydom.ru> <E1IuX7W-0002Mw-3Z@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <b41c75520711201001j6746f7b7r85d14dddd5a9eec8@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF8A26390AAAE1C1552558ADD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Claus Guttesen wrote: > I'm running two DL360 G5 webservers each with two quad-core cpu's. > Each have 8 GB of ram, one is 2 Ghz and the other is 2.33 Ghz. They > run just fine. These two webservers have twice the weight of three > opterons with two dual-core cpu's on our coyote load-balancer. The issue in this thread is not if they are fast, but could they be made faster by shortening sys time :) (btw. what is your sys time under stress?) The systems I reported about are "fast enough" for me, but they are not for the person who started the thread, and I agree that it looks like there could be a problem. --------------enigF8A26390AAAE1C1552558ADD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHQyZ6ldnAQVacBcgRAo5tAKDcnXhvltAil6H8I9PCyKe5c/j9PgCg19/d o81kBf6YWGHlhbloFaYBxe4= =znFb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF8A26390AAAE1C1552558ADD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fhv8ps$2iq$1>