Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:45:44 -0500 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin <pldrouin@pldrouin.net> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> Cc: acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: Performance problem since updating from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE last friday Message-ID: <4383E5E8.5050905@pldrouin.net> In-Reply-To: <ygeveyk2ga4.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <4377775B.3080606@pldrouin.net> <20051114105854.GA1041@galgenberg.net> <4378CC14.2020109@pldrouin.net> <ygek6f9g83g.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <437A3901.8010001@pldrouin.net> <437A3B96.4040300@root.org> <437B42C0.9040605@pldrouin.net> <437CAEB0.9060202@pldrouin.net> <yge7jb0x28z.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <43837A34.1030900@root.org> <ygeveyk2ga4.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>>>>>>On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
>>>>>>Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
>nate> Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is
>nate> heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs
>nate> which only test on Windows and so not everyone makes BIF simple. On my
>nate> laptops, BIF is as fast as BST.
>
>You are welcome. My laptops are also fast enough for BIF. I
>remembered that iwasaki-san grouched at the heavyweight of BIF when he
>was writing cmbat support.
>
>nate> I don't like the patch approach (changing the API), however. Let me
>nate> look at it and commit a fix that doesn't change the API.
>
>Yes, I didn't feel satisfaction with my patch, too. So, I anticipated
>that you say so. :-)
>
>Sincerely,
>
>--
>Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
>ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
>http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
>
>
>
Is it that much related to laptop performance? Because the M70 I have is
currently the fastest laptop made by Dell and cmbat makes it to hang on
FreeBSD...
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4383E5E8.5050905>