Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Jun 1996 21:36:19 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: longstanding, woeful inadeqacy 
Message-ID:  <199606270236.VAA02519@compound.Think.COM>
References:  <199606270008.TAA28833@compound.Think.COM> <28552.835835464@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth Jordan K. Hubbard on Wed, 26 June:
: I think it's something that'd be far more trouble that it's worth
: to "fix" - why not just debug the binary being exec'd if that's the
: issue?

Similarly, fork.  

The reason why you would want to debug through the exec is
to debug in the correct environment.  fork is perhaps a more
compelling case?








Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606270236.VAA02519>