Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 23:40:30 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh-1.2.27 remote buffer overflow - work around ?? Message-ID: <199911150440.XAA04463@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911142308001.48038-100000@green.myip.org> References: <4.1.19991114225545.04626d60@granite.sentex.ca> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911142308001.48038-100000@green.myip.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sun, 14 Nov 1999 23:12:19 -0500 (EST), Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.ORG> said: > Yes, but it would also be against the patents of our wonderful RSA. You missed an important point: >> Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike >> Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400 So Mike is located in Canada, and thus the patent may not apply to him (at least not the US patent). A better question is: why does Mike want people to make operator-assisted calls to Peru when trying to reach him? -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911150440.XAA04463>