Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 21:07:33 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de> To: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> Cc: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Message-ID: <20000402210733.A25516@cicely8.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20000402200254.A69811@myhakas.matti.ee>; from vallo@matti.ee on Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 08:02:54PM %2B0200 References: <20000331212544.A59295@myhakas.matti.ee> <200003311932.VAA70873@freebsd.dk> <20000401091140.A51727@freebie.lemis.com> <20000402011538.B24134@cicely8.cicely.de> <20000402015016.C24134@cicely8.cicely.de> <20000402153935.A64937@myhakas.matti.ee> <20000402173729.A25194@cicely8.cicely.de> <20000402200254.A69811@myhakas.matti.ee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 08:02:54PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > Yes, but I don't have space for crashdump and I can't build new kernel > with limited memory usage because I don't have /usr filesystem up and > running. Is there a way to limit memory usage without recompiling > kernel? I can store 32MB crashdump at the moment, no separate /var > filesystem because I thought 4.0-RELEASE will be stable enough for > experimenting with vinum.. > I don't have another 4.0-RELEASE or stable system but I'll try to build > 4.0-R kernel on -current system. Just to clearify the things... Are these problems with 4.0-RELEASE with 4.0-STABLE or with 5.0-CURRENT? -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000402210733.A25516>