Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 19:50:53 +0000 (UTC) From: doug <doug@safeport.com> To: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount SMB Message-ID: <6bf6b4ac-fae-eb5c-8f31-e19d74b17c3e@safeport.com> In-Reply-To: <ZtgnnGk41mzXjAQI@rail.eu.org> References: <trinity-2273f71b-07af-48f6-b8e8-b98e289db6f2-1724927699916@3c-app-mailcom-bs06> <20240829220603.c2c6fba0.freebsd@edvax.de> <0a30aafe-659c-43db-855d-01de824e8f9f@gmx.at> <trinity-ebe100d9-2909-49af-bdfa-d509e0835b2b-1725438423547@3c-app-mailcom-bs02> <ZtgnnGk41mzXjAQI@rail.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, Erwan David wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:27:03AM CEST, Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com> said: >> >> >>> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2024 at 1:18 PM >>> From: "infoomatic" <infoomatic@gmx.at> >>> To: questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: Re: mount SMB >>> >>> beware: mount_smbfs only supports protocol version 1, which is hardly >>> used any more. Modern systems have been using versions 3.11+ for a long >>> time now. I have been hoping for an upgrade for a long time already >> >> Hi, >> >> Exactly. I didn't mention it but that is problem. I haven't even tried >> to use the native solution as it's a bad idea and I am pretty sure it >> won't work anymore... >> >> It seems that smbnetfs is the only way to mount a contemporary SMB share. > > rclone might also be a solution > smb connections are only used to make files, printers, named pipes, and other network resources on a windows host available to FreeBSD workstations on a LAN. Security, at least for us, is not an issue as no user has a password. smb is all used for IPC communications. Any issues from this can be handled by a fire wall. In our setup no host on the LAN is exposed to the internet. Doug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6bf6b4ac-fae-eb5c-8f31-e19d74b17c3e>