Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 01:22:16 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tag day is upon us! Message-ID: <199901201722.BAA21145@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:05:04 MST." <199901201705.KAA09223@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote:
> > > "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> > > > At some point today, depending on various sleep schedules and
> > > > whatnot, the tree will branch and 3.1-stable will be created.
> > > > The HEAD branch will then be known as 4.0-current.
> > >
> > > What tag are you going to use?
> >
> > The 3.x branch will be RELENG_3. The releases on the branch will be
> > RELENG_3_1_RELEASE, RELENG_3_2_RELEASE etc.
> >
> > The question is though, what will newvers.sh call it. I'd like it to be
> > 3.1-BETA, then 3.1-RELEASE, then 3.1-STABLE, and when it's nearly 3.2
> > time, we go from 3.1-STABLE to 3.2-BETA. IMHO, we shouldn't use 3.1-STABLE
> > both before and after 3.1-RELEASE. The last I knew, jkh wasn't too keen
> > on that though.
>
> 3.0-STABLE, since it's post 3.0R?
That works for me too.
Cheers,
-Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901201722.BAA21145>