Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:25:03 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: bhyve: centos 7.1 with multiple virtual processors Message-ID: <559CD04F.4090003@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <55891335.5090403@FreeBSD.org> References: <5587EE05.2020001@FreeBSD.org> <CAFgRE9Hpxm7pC_ETdQJKNk7FwbGvYjd60D0bnoOC=t46aJvusQ@mail.gmail.com> <558900A7.40609@FreeBSD.org> <CAFgRE9E5uTDUomaibL6jmxNwGJnz2RXiGxLDNoKkQ=%2BRBsh69A@mail.gmail.com> <55891335.5090403@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23/06/2015 11:05, Andriy Gapon wrote: > P.S. meanwhile I found this old-ish thread that seems to describe exactly the > problem I am seeing but on real hardware: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1483297 An update: the problem is fixed by http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id=c4288334818c81c946acb23d2319881f58c3d497 P.S. Perhaps, it's worth checking if those spurious interrupts (from PIT) are just a result of timing or if bhyve might deviate from the specifications there. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?559CD04F.4090003>