Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 22:28:58 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>, Eivind Eklund <eivind@freebsd.org>, "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, committers@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/make.conf abuse Message-ID: <199910100428.WAA79115@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 09 Oct 1999 17:54:03 BST." <19991009175403.A54620@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> References: <19991009175403.A54620@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <19991008192943.S71340@bitbox.follo.net> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910082125560.312-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19991009175403.A54620@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> Nik Clayton writes: : Perhaps /usr/local/etc/make.conf would be better? Or at least a variable : (which can be defined in /etc/make.conf) which points to the file, so that : the admin can easily set local policy. How is that different from /etc/make.conf? No, an in tree method is needed, even if it isn't the only one? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910100428.WAA79115>