Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:29:59 +0300 From: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com> To: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> Cc: FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10.0-BETA1 ZFS install -- /var/empty read-only Message-ID: <CA%2B7WWSc51d2G7KfoP=sg1uL4cyKDGxxLikn5b2WNh8doAQDufQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5267CE4B.8050602@vangyzen.net> References: <5267CE4B.8050602@vangyzen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> wrote: > I just installed 10.0-BETA1 using the [very cool] new automatic ZFS > option. I noticed that /var/empty is not mounted read-only. I suspect > it could be. I made it so, and sshd still seemed to work. > > Eric I don't think there's a standard for how to break down the ZFS pool to individual datasets. If the install made only a single dataset for /var you would then effectively get a read-write /var/empty. The applies if you install on UFS and don't assign a separate filesystem for /var/empty like the default install does in fact. -Kimmo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B7WWSc51d2G7KfoP=sg1uL4cyKDGxxLikn5b2WNh8doAQDufQ>