Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:26:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Thomas Moestl <tmm@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc_r/uthread uthread_acl_aclcheck_fd.c uthread_acl_delete_fd.c uthread_acl_get_fd.c uthread_acl_set_fd.c uthread_cap_get_fd.c uthread_cap_set_fd.c pthread_private.h Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010404151816.12121C-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <200104041810.f34IAQO31881@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Thomas Moestl wrote: > tmm 2001/04/04 11:10:26 PDT > > Modified files: > lib/libc_r/uthread pthread_private.h > Added files: > lib/libc_r/uthread uthread_acl_aclcheck_fd.c > uthread_acl_delete_fd.c > uthread_acl_get_fd.c uthread_acl_set_fd.c > uthread_cap_get_fd.c uthread_cap_set_fd.c > Log: > Add thread safety wrappers for the posix1e syscalls that deal with file > descriptors. > > Approved by: rwatson > Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project No big deal, but fd locking has been disabled for a while in -current. I want to eventually eliminate all the _FD_LOCK and _FD_UNLOCK calls and remove wrappers whose only purpose is to provide fd locking. BTW, why do all the acl system calls begin with 2 underscores? Is that specified by the POSIX1.e standard? -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1010404151816.12121C-100000>