Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 16:20:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/28555: [PATCH] style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. Message-ID: <200107022320.f62NK4S69064@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/28555; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/28555: [PATCH] style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 16:13:26 -0700 Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> writes: > Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> types: > > Regardless, this does not belong as a PR, let alone in the docs/ > > category. It belongs as a post on -hackers, asking what people think, > > not as a change request. Since *developers* are expected to follow > > style(9), it is the *developers* (i.e., -hackers@) that you should be > > proposing the change to. > > We both agree I'm not proposing a change in the style they have to > follow; I'm just proposing making something explicit instead of > implicit. As such, I'm not sure it warrants discussion. I'm not suggesting that you should get every developer's approval, but I am suggesting that wider review than the -doc list would be nice, esp. for a document that defines policy. Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107022320.f62NK4S69064>