Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:23:00 -0400 From: Feebrijee <feebrijee@logrus.mv.com> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Microsoft Sillyness Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970612142300.00706fe4@bort.mv.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
While cruising through Microsoft's recently published FAQ on IE for UNIX, I read this question and the afforementioned monopoly's increadibly outspoken answer: Q: How can Microsoft be confident it can release a 4.0 browser for UNIX given the difficulties releasing a 3.0 product? A: Glad you asked. We invite anyone with questions about our ability to make up for lost time to consider our track record in delivering a superior Mac version of Internet Explorer. It has come from behind and now offers a much better browser than Netscape Navigator or any other Mac browser. Internet Explorer for Macintosh is not only superior in feature set, but offers better performance while requiring significantly less memory compared to Navigator. On the Windows 3.1 platform, we deliver the only browser that supports a final production version of the Java Virtual Machine. The reason for our delay on UNIX is so that we can deliver a similarly great 4.0 product for our UNIX customers. The question now seems to be: Which political office is Microsoft's publicist going for in the 2000 election? Cheers!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1.5.4.32.19970612142300.00706fe4>