Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:33:50 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing? Message-ID: <20071222103350.GA2747@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <200712220531.WAA09277@lariat.net> References: <200712220531.WAA09277@lariat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21.12.2007 at 22:31:24 -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > As has been reported in some other messages on this list, Linux is currently > blowing FreeBSD away. It's taking as much as 20% less time to get through > the benchmark, depending on exactly how the random shuffle came out. This is > with 4 GB RAM, the GENERIC FreeBSD SMP kernel (using SCHED_ULE), and aufs as > the storage schema for Squid. Apples and Oranges, I know, but if you're building a "simple" reverse cacheing proxy, have you considered Varnish? Would be very interessting how it would compare to a) FreeBSD+Squid b) Linux+Squid and c) Linux+Varnish. Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and remove all doubt.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071222103350.GA2747>