Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:00:47 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: mark@markdnet.demon.co.uk Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UPDATE2: ATA mkIII first official patches - please test! Message-ID: <4214A38F.7020706@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <200502171338.j1HDbwO2060046@spider.deepcore.dk> References: <200502171338.j1HDbwO2060046@spider.deepcore.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mark@markdnet.demon.co.uk wrote: > sos@DeepCore.dk wrote: >=20 >>Marcus Grando wrote: >> >>>My problem persist... >>> >>>Any other patch? or idea? >> >>Hmm, does it work without apic ? without ACPI ? >>And your cabling is correct and spec conformant ? >>The 686A' I have in the lab works just dandy... >=20 >=20 > Just an observation, but my Promise ATA-100 controller will drive 1 UDM= A-66 and one UDMA-100 disk fine at UDMA-33 with the cable on the wrong wa= y round (oops) using the previous update. Well, the problem with "wrong way around" is that determining what the=20 cable is fails in unpredictable ways, as long as your transfer rates are = reduced there is no problems. However if a higher transferate is used=20 than the cable is spec'd for you get ICRC errors as this was originally=20 about. --=20 -S=F8ren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4214A38F.7020706>