Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 13:05:51 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/softupdates softdep.h ffs_softdep.c Message-ID: <20000622130551.A5363@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <20000621223309.G47446@argon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@technologist.com on Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 10:33:09PM -0400 References: <200006220029.RAA97417@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000621223309.G47446@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Will Andrews (andrews@technologist.com): > is it practical to do this? I have it enabled on all filesystems on my > local machines and have rarely (if ever) had problems directly related > to softupdates. I have on cheap motherboards/RAM. I've always got about 30 days uptime with softupdates and then a spontanous reboot, w/o softupdates I got 80 days and then a power outage :) Somehow, softupdates dislikes my cheap hardware when it is stressed by high I/O. However, it might be in GENERIC but commented out (my favourite) Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000622130551.A5363>