Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 23:53:05 -0600 From: "Jacques A . Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Michael Hohmuth <hohmuth@olymp.sax.de> Cc: grog@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/16713: Vinum: some processes would not die; ps axl advised Message-ID: <20000225235305.A16959@spawn.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <87wvnshb1q.fsf@olymp.sax.de>; from hohmuth@olymp.sax.de on Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 04:56:01AM %2B0100 References: <200002150413.UAA64462@freefall.freebsd.org> <87wvnshb1q.fsf@olymp.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 04:56:01AM +0100, Michael Hohmuth wrote:
> I don't know what you mean by ``problem fixed'' or ``MFC,'' but for me
> the problem persists. I have built a -STABLE kernel on Feb 19 and
> still see the "some processes would not die" message.
>
> Wasn't there supposed to be a "feedback" state in the bug-report
> system that kept the bug report open until the fix was tested by the
> original problem reporter?
Hrm,
I think you are correct: the bug has not been addressed. See
related PR kern/14356 with a fix from 15. October 1999.
Greg has made it so that vinumd now sets P_SYSTEM (which was also
recommended in kern/14356) but this isn't the issue. vinumd is still a
child of init, and so init will wait on it at shutdown time. To fix
this problem, vinumd must be removed from init's child list.
I didn't notice that this part of the commit was missing (haven't
rebuild world yet) when I previously asked Greg to close PR kern/14356.
Greg, was this an oversight?
Thanks,
--
Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000225235305.A16959>