Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:30:11 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=C3=B3n?= <elferdo@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11
Message-ID:  <CAMwkeZw_NX7A-Z0hyrTB3w02pu3dHUVVxe0wqVo0dRNzMxMQTg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHM0Q_ML64DveUG%2B037BTZHtBuSjR-DH5Wy%2BqbLS8%2B3YHOri4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20160819073422.4292997b@X220.alogt.com> <af0fefab-69d7-f0a9-3d6d-4a9891d5a156@FreeBSD.org> <20160821144505.27c0f55d@X220.alogt.com> <827183a944ee4052649c152d65204444@schema31.it> <20160822101423.GF18643@e-new.0x20.net> <CAHM0Q_My2otDtVSzTiQMHE=ty%2B7kEBP%2BwfFofBvOzoz8ro%2B-sQ@mail.gmail.com> <79F32FFD-BBDF-4359-A4CB-C80A3FC59EAD@FreeBSD.org> <20160828183242.759bb6c2@freedom.alkumuna.eu> <CAHM0Q_MCGvfn5np7KdYq_h3cyv6w%2BVzjOMyOJzK7LYpPP6UaAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHM0Q_OqYTQUX69%2BQpYxiNDws_w9XY9B%2B3Pe3PxAN6rT5-AYpA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMwkeZyJgzdzDqP3Pi4-CH8pM7e_afoM-cJyp3t5oBXJGFyzZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHM0Q_ML64DveUG%2B037BTZHtBuSjR-DH5Wy%2BqbLS8%2B3YHOri4Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2016-08-29 3:04 GMT+02:00 K. Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org>:

> > I'm writing from my cellphone away from my computer, so take this with a
> > grain of salt:
> >
> > -L/usr/local/llvm38/lib
>
> You're missing the point. If your webserver crashes every other day,
> the fact that you can run a batch job to restart it doesn't make it
> OK.
>
>
Fair enough, I misunderstood the point as "clang, even from ports, cannot
do omp at all [from a shell]".


> [...] Requiring additional tweaking to build on FreeBSD
> or requiring users to install gcc is kind of underwhelming.
>

Isn't that precisely what the ports infrastructure is supposed to do? What
about compiler.mk? If it can provide an extra library-dirs argument to the
port's configure then we're not that bad. And still I agree, this is far
from an ideal situation, and we speaking about finding a library, we have
still not touched having clang use the LLVM linker...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMwkeZw_NX7A-Z0hyrTB3w02pu3dHUVVxe0wqVo0dRNzMxMQTg>