Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Oct 2018 10:49:51 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 232463] EBR slice cannot be added partitions to
Message-ID:  <bug-232463-227-tZ1IrpP9BH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-232463-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-232463-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232463

--- Comment #3 from Andrey V. Elsukov <ae@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to bourne.identity@hotmail.com from comment #2)
> Hi Andrey,
> 
> Thanks, but that is quite surprising. Why cannot the default kernel have EBR
> compatibility switched on, rather than forcing the user recompile the whole
> kernel for such a small thing ? People do not want to recompile kernels
> unless there is a significant cause.
> 
> As it happens, I am writing a book about FreeBSD/Linux/Cygwin. And whereever
> the book needs EBR work, I have to document it as MBR (gpart create -s MBR).
> This is really not desired for me, or for any of my readers.

This is because without EBR_COMPAT option, EBR partition naming/numbering will
be not compatible with old installations.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-232463-227-tZ1IrpP9BH>