Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:23:32 +0200 From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry@herbelot.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] if_dc cleanups.. Message-ID: <200605251023.34963.thierry@herbelot.com> In-Reply-To: <200605241556.44483.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200605241556.44483.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Wednesday 24 May 2006 21:56, John Baldwin a écrit : > I've changed if_dc to use the full 32-bit device ID instead of just the > lower 16-bit device ID in dc_attach() so that it doesn't have to deal with > hacks like the FAKE device and to make it easier to add new device IDs that > have collisions in the future. I've compiled it but have no dc(4) hardware > to test with, so please test. Patch is available at: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/if_dc.patch my dc is still probed and detected with your patch : dc0: <82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX> port 0x9400-0x94ff mem 0xd8000000-0xd80000ff irq 19 at device 9.0 on pci0 dc0: Reserved 0x100 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0x9400 miibus0: <MII bus> on dc0 bmtphy0: <BCM5201 10/100baseTX PHY> on miibus0 bmtphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto dc0: bpf attached dc0: Ethernet address: 00:02:e3:08:63:af dc0: [MPSAFE] the same dc is currently used to update the -current sources over NFS, without any visible side effects. Thanks TfH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605251023.34963.thierry>