Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 23:09:39 -0600 From: Warner Losh <wlosh@bsdimp.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>, Bruce Simpson <bms@fastmail.net>, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Security Team <secteam@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r303716 - head/crypto/openssh Message-ID: <EB92BA56-C1C4-4D97-B992-78C278DDFE04@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfr%2BaQ5PqF93chR%2Bb-uk9x7XsktcP4DD=GELaL=cXePtQQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201608031608.u73G8Mjq055909@repo.freebsd.org> <d419bddd-fe56-bc11-8965-142ca0b94ebc@fastmail.net> <9a01870a-d99d-13a2-54bd-01d32616263c@fastmail.net> <CAPQ4fftQ30_aqU8V_ea-WEKBdMZs5H9Rwxnfa0crid_df049nQ@mail.gmail.com> <b99c06ac-82d6-ccda-419c-2ece5be4636f@fastmail.net> <30e655d1-1df7-5e2a-fccb-269e3cea4684@freebsd.org> <20160807204039.GB79784@server.rulingia.com> <ab58ed22-7dd1-7b8d-fcc5-71def5936901@freebsd.org> <8371434C-86F6-4DCB-82D4-F236BBC2F9A2@bsdimp.com> <86shufv8yt.fsf@desk.des.no> <CANCZdfr%2BaQ5PqF93chR%2Bb-uk9x7XsktcP4DD=GELaL=cXePtQQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Aug 8, 2016, at 10:45 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> = wrote: >> Warner Losh <wlosh@bsdimp.com> writes: >>> Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> writes: >>>> FreeBSD 11 is not released yet (betas are not counted), stable-10 = too, >>>> so it is right time to deprecate for them. >>> Nice try, but feature freeze was months ago. Have you got buy in = from the >>> security officer and the release engineer? >>>=20 >>> I didn=E2=80=99t think so... >>=20 >> You have absolutely *no* basis for this claim, and I would like you = to >> retract it. >=20 > Why do I need to retract anything? He provided pointers to the re@ = approval. >=20 > Come on DES. Actually, you=E2=80=99re right. My defensive reaction was wrong. I=E2=80=99m sorry DES. What I said was in the heat of the moment, and = isn=E2=80=99t supported by the facts. I was wrong to say it like I did, especially since I = didn=E2=80=99t check into it first. Please forgive my outbursts. Warner=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EB92BA56-C1C4-4D97-B992-78C278DDFE04>