Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 07:12:24 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: W Gerald Hicks <wghicks@bellsouth.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: A bug in the sppp driver? Message-ID: <199910040612.HAA00448@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:46:30 EDT." <199909301648.MAA12186@etinc.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> At 05:54 AM 9/30/99 -0400, W Gerald Hicks wrote:
> >
> >> doing state machines with switch statements is a big mess.
> >
> >Still, you'll find a lot of them around. Do you have a favored
> >technique for coding complex state machines? (I'm a collector :)
>
>
> yes, state tables. Clean and easy to modify.
IMHO state tables are fine in theory. The problem is that the ``do
this'' bit sometimes needs to be split into two - one before the
state change and one after, and that same bit is frequently ``almost
the same'' as the ``do this'' bit for another transition.
Once you start coding it, you start to bring the common bits of code
into common routines, and eventually end up actually passing the
from/to states into those functions.
I found that redesigning the ppp(8) state machine eventually ended up
with lots of switch statements and a result that was nothing like I
had in mind when I started writing it ! It registers state
transition handlers to a certain extent, but there are too few
handlers and lots of ``if I'm in this state'' code.
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! <brian@FreeBSD.org.uk>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910040612.HAA00448>